Google Drive is undergoing a lot of
publicity lately, and it is not due to the amazing innovation in
cloud storage, or even because you can get 5gb for free that sync's
across all google enabled devices, not in the least bit. It's
because the privacy policy is worded in such a way that your
documents, content, files, pictures, and any media you that you store
in the cloud are now 'owned' by Google.
Though, the policy doesn't explicitly
say this, it can be interpreted that way. This article from Cnn.com explains that Google Drive's terms of service states
“Google reserves the right to 'use, host, store, reproduce, modify,
create derivative works (such as those resulting from translations,
adaptations or other changes we make so that your content works
better with our Services), communicate, publish, publicly perform,
publicly display and distribute” anything that you upload to the
Google Drive. Furthermore the 'unified privacy policy' of Google
explicitly states that it won't use your content for anything other
than “provide, maintain, protect and improve [its services], [and]
to develop new ones”
This implies that anything you post, as
the article explains, such as a picture could end up on a promotional
advertisement. Now your face is blasted across the web, providing
revenue to google, with no royalties needed, because the legal terms
explicitly state that anything you upload to the Google Drive is
subject to this type of use, without additional consent from the
user.
In addition to this bypass of consent
based usage of your files to 'promote' a Google service, people are
worried about just how public this material is. If you consider the
Megaupload scandal, the article explains that it's possible for your
content on the cloud to be subject to a subpoena and taken off the
cloud forever.
In retrospect, the new unified privacy
policy that Google introduced months ago, explicitly said that any
data gathered from your activity cannot be used cross-service, so it
begs the question of – Where is the line drawn for 'cross-service'?
Google stated that data gathered from e-mail content within G-Mail
wouldn't be used for other services, for example advertising on the
Search engine, but it can be used for advertisements in the actual
E-Mail interface?
At first I thought the new privacy
policy implemented by Google was fairly transparent, but in hindsight
the transparency was a farce. Vague interpretations of the words
Service, Product and Promotion suggests the need for more intense
research and awareness among users, rather than taking the policy at
face value.
No comments:
Post a Comment